TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/AThe Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) provides a simple, scalable, elastic file system for Linux-based workloads for use with AWS Cloud services and on-premises resources.

    $0.04

    per GB

    Oracle ZFS

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AOracle ZFS Storage Appliance is designed to power diverse workloads so users efficiently consolidate legacy storage systems and achieve universal application acceleration and reliable data protection for data.N/A
    Pricing
    Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)Oracle ZFS
    Editions & Modules
    US East & West Region
    $0.043
    per month per GB (One zone)
    Europe (Ireland) Region
    $0.046
    per month per GB (One zone)
    Asia Pacific & Canada Region
    $0.047
    per month per GB (One zone)
    Africa (Cape Town) Region
    $0.054
    per month per GB (One zone)
    AWS GovCloud (US-East)
    $0.056
    per month per GB (One zone)
    US East & West Region
    $0.08
    per month per GB (Standard)
    Asia Pacific & Canada Region
    $0.09
    per month per GB (Standard)
    Europe (Ireland) Region
    $0.09
    per month per GB (Standard)
    Africa (Cape Town) Region
    $0.10
    per month per GB (Standard)
    AWS GovCloud (US-East)
    $0.11
    per month per GB (Standard)
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)Oracle ZFS
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsThere is no minimum fee or setup charge. You pay only for the storage you use, for read and write access to data stored in Infrequent Access storage classes, and for any provisioned throughput. Amazon EFS offers four storage classes: two standard storage classes, including Amazon EFS Standard and Amazon EFS Standard-Infrequent Access (EFS Standard-IA), and two One Zone storage classes, including Amazon EFS One Zone and Amazon EFS One Zone-Infrequent Access—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)Oracle ZFS
    Considered Both Products
    Amazon AWS
    No answer on this topic
    Oracle
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)Oracle ZFS
    Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
    Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) and Oracle ZFS
    Feature
    Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)
    8.8
    5 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Oracle ZFS
    -
    Ratings
    Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dynamic scaling10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Elastic load balancing10.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pre-configured templates4.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Monitoring tools8.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pre-defined machine images7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Operating system support9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security controls10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automation10.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)Oracle ZFS
    Small Businesses
    DigitalOcean Droplets
    Score8.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers
    Score8.7 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    SAP on IBM Cloud
    Score9.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)Oracle ZFS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.5
    (5 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Amazon Elastic File System (EFS)Oracle ZFS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    While the idea is to utilize it enterprise wide; it sometimes doesn't work well in smaller applications and that causes slowdowns and impacts productivity. Also when evaluating EFS versus EBS - one needs to look at cost as EFS is a lot more expensive to implement and run so you need to weigh cost benefits of both systems and choose the best for you.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    For scenarios where the implementation is an Oracle ecosystem and the need for high-performance storage is present, undoubtedly the ideal solution is Oracle ZFS due to the native integration that exists, for example, with SPARC equipment, Exadata, and traditional architecture running Oracle Linux or Solariums (depending on the case), as well as in highly demanding industries in terms of storage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • This is very easy to setup and has a great performance.
    • As per the name, Elastic grows as your data grows.
    • We can run multiple EC2 instances.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Software RAIDZ. Create storage arrays using best available RAID technologies for excellent disk stability
    • Array images and backups. Allows administrators to instantly create disk snapshots, to minimize time disk is unavailable (on the order of seconds, not minutes or hours).
    • Automatic de-deduplication/compression. ZFS will automatically de-dedup data on disk, allowing for more efficient use of the entire disk for unique data. It will also automatically compress data stored on the disk, allowing for even more usage of the available disk space. Great for infrequently accessed backups (There is some performance cost to compression).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • For early age start it would be costly
    • Not necessary for small scale system, but very beneficial for system which have high TPS and huge user base
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Because it was due to a software originally designed for Solaris. configuration in other environments can be cumbersome for inexperienced implementers.
    • The proprietary particularity of this File System makes it in some cases very difficult to implement in highly heterogeneous environments.
    • I think that additional forms of integration with more environments should be created.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    The documentation is sufficient for setting up and it is basic NFS for mounting so not much support is required. I have not had any issues to warrant a request with AWS support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    EFS is easier to configure, no need for Active Directory.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    ZFS is so far beyond the other filesystems available right now, offering full suites of tools for data management, backup, recovery, maintenance, monitoring, etc. It's not even fair to compare them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • Cost is always a paramount issue when looking at ROI
    • It is fast and if that's what you need for your implementation - you probably will not find a better solution
    • Expertise in EFS is sometimes hard to come by so it's best to look at your employee's ability to grasp this technology. Otherwise, it's a pretty steep learning curve.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • In highly transactional and data-intensive environments such as 200 million records per month or more.
    • Banking also represents an ideal niche for this type of implementation due to its high volume of data and the need for security in this industry with over 100 million records per day and online history maintenance for more than 10 years (in most cases).
    • The Return on Investment or ROI is clearly seen in the medium term since your storage solution would be in your safekeeping without having to pay anything additional to regular maintenance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots