Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) vs. Oracle ZFS
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Score7.5 out of 10 | N/A | The Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) provides a simple, scalable, elastic file system for Linux-based workloads for use with AWS Cloud services and on-premises resources. | $0.04 per GB |
Oracle ZFS | Score8.2 out of 10 | N/A | Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance is designed to power diverse workloads so users efficiently consolidate legacy storage systems and achieve universal application acceleration and reliable data protection for data. | N/A |
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Oracle ZFS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | There is no minimum fee or setup charge. You pay only for the storage you use, for read and write access to data stored in Infrequent Access storage classes, and for any provisioned throughput. Amazon EFS offers four storage classes: two standard storage classes, including Amazon EFS Standard and Amazon EFS Standard-Infrequent Access (EFS Standard-IA), and two One Zone storage classes, including Amazon EFS One Zone and Amazon EFS One Zone-Infrequent Access | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Oracle ZFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Oracle ZFS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Oracle ZFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | DigitalOcean Droplets Score8.8 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Score8.7 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | SAP on IBM Cloud Score9.5 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Oracle ZFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.5 | 10.0 |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Oracle ZFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |



