TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Amazon DynamoDB

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AAmazon DynamoDB is a cloud-native, NoSQL, serverless database service.

    $0

    capacity unit per hour

    Azure SQL Database

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AAzure SQL Database is Microsoft's relational database as a service (DBaaS).

    $0.50

    Per Hour

    Pricing
    Amazon DynamoDBAzure SQL Database
    Editions & Modules
    Provisioned - Read Operation
    $0.00013
    capacity unit per hour
    Provisioned - Write Operation
    $0.00065
    capacity unit per hour
    Provisioned - Global Tables
    $0.000975
    per Read Capacity
    On-Demand Streams
    $0.02
    per 100,000 read operations
    Provisioned - Streams
    $0.02
    per 100,000 read operations
    On-Demand Data Requests Outside AWS Regions
    $0.09
    per GB
    Provisioned - Data Requests Outside AWS Regions
    $0.09
    per GB
    On-Demand Snapshot
    $0.10
    per GB per month
    Provisioned - Snapshot
    $0.10
    per GB per month
    On-Demand Restoring a Backup
    $0.15
    per GB
    Provisioned - Restoring a Backup
    $0.15
    per GB
    On-Demand Point-in-Time Recovery
    $0.20
    per GB per month
    Provisioned - Point-in-Time Recovery
    $0.20
    per GB per month
    On-Demand Read Operation
    $0.25
    per million requests
    On-Demand Data Stored
    $0.25
    per GB per month
    Provisioned - Data Stored
    $0.25
    per GB per month
    On-Demand - Write Operation
    $1.25
    per million requests
    On-Demand Global Tables
    $1.875
    per million write operations replicated
    2 vCORE
    $0.5044
    Per Hour
    6 vCORE
    $1.5131
    Per Hour
    10 vCORE
    $2.52
    Per Hour
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Amazon DynamoDBAzure SQL Database
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Amazon DynamoDBAzure SQL Database
    Considered Both Products
    Amazon AWS
    Chose Amazon DynamoDB
    MongoDB has some performance issues and can get corrupted from time to time and has needed to be rebuilt. We have not had that experience while using DynamoDB.
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon DynamoDB
    Dynamo DB is definitely more efficient and able to be configured easier than both. I just would say you have to know what you are doing with SQL as well. Because if you don’t know anything about SQL, you could always use Dynamo DB to help store your big data.
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon DynamoDB
    I didn't select it over MongoDB or Azure DocumentDB. In fact, we use all three. We let the developers make the choice.
    Incentivized
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    46 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    13 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    43 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    12 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    45 Answers
    92%
    Happy with the feature set
    12 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    38 Answers
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    11 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    93%
    Implementation went as expected
    39 Answers
    92%
    Implementation went as expected
    12 Answers
    Features
    Amazon DynamoDBAzure SQL Database
    NoSQL Databases
    Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Amazon DynamoDB and Azure SQL Database
    Feature
    Amazon DynamoDB
    9.2
    69 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Azure SQL Database
    -
    Ratings
    Performance9.368 Ratings00 Ratings
    Availability9.569 Ratings00 Ratings
    Concurrency9.067 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security9.269 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scalability9.468 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data model flexibility8.266 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility10.023 Ratings00 Ratings
    Database-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Database-as-a-Service features of Amazon DynamoDB and Azure SQL Database
    Feature
    Amazon DynamoDB
    -
    Ratings
    Azure SQL Database
    9.2
    28 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Automatic software patching00 Ratings9.026 Ratings
    Database scalability00 Ratings9.028 Ratings
    Automated backups00 Ratings10.028 Ratings
    Database security provisions00 Ratings9.028 Ratings
    Monitoring and metrics00 Ratings8.027 Ratings
    Automatic host deployment00 Ratings10.023 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Amazon DynamoDBAzure SQL Database
    Small Businesses
    Redis Software
    Score8.3 out of 10
    MongoDB Atlas
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Azure Database
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Google BigQuery
    Score8.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Amazon DynamoDBAzure SQL Database
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (79 ratings)
    8.0
    (28 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (34 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    9.1
    (42 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.2
    (4 ratings)
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.1
    (42 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Amazon DynamoDBAzure SQL Database
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    It’s great for server less and real-time applications. It would be great for gaming and mobile apps. However, if you need relational database and have fixed budget, do not use it. While budget can be managed, you need to be careful. Also this is not a tool for storing big data, there are other wide-column database types you could use for it ins the ad
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Your upcoming app can be built faster on a fully managed SQL database and can be moved into Azure with a few to no application code changes. Flexible and responsive server less computing and Hyperscale storage can cope with your changing requirements and one of the main benefits is the reduction in costs, which is noticeable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • To manage varying workloads, it enables users to increase capacity as necessary and decrease it as needed.
    • Users can take advantage of its auto-scaling, in-memory caching, and backup without paying for the services of a database administrator.
    • We can use it for low scale operations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Maintenance is always an issue, so using a cloud solution saves a lot of trouble.
    • On premise solutions always suffer from fragmented implementations here and there, where several "dba's" keep track of security and maintenance. With a cloud database it's much easier to keep a central overview.
    • Security options in SQL database are next level... data masking, hiding sensitive data where always neglected on premise, whereas you'll get this automatically in the cloud.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • Cost model may not be easy to control and may lead to higher costs if not carefully planned
    • Indexing may be a cost culprit when not planned, because it's not included on the data costs
    • The Query Language may not fulfill everybody's expectations, as it has less features than those of competitors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • One needs to be aware that some T-SQL features are simply not available.
    • The programmatic access to server, trace flags, hardware from within Azure SQL Database is taken away (for a good reason).
    • No SQL Agent so your jobs need to be orchestrated differently.
    • The maximum concurrent logins maybe an unexpected problem.
    • Sudden disconnects.
    • The developers and admin must study the capacity and tier usage limits https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-subscription-service-limits otherwise some errors or even transaction aborts never seen before can occur.
    • Only one Latin Collation choice.
    • There is no way to debug T-SQL ( a big drawback in my point of view).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Amazon AWS
    It's core to our business, we couldn't survive without it. We use it to drive everything from FTP logins to processing stories and delivering them to clients. It's reliable and easy to query from all of our pipeline services. Integration with things like AWS Lambda makes it easy to trigger events and run code whenever something changes in the database.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    This is best solution as a DBA one could expect from a service provider and as a cloud service, it removes all your hassles.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    Functionally, DynamoDB has the features needed to use it. The interface is not as easy to use, which impacts its usability. Being familiar with AWS in general is helpful in understanding the interface, however it would be better if the interface more closely aligned with traditional tools for managing datastores.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    It just works!
    Read full review
    Performance
    Amazon AWS
    It works very well across all the regions and response time is also very quick due to AWS's internal data transfer. Plus if your product requires HIPPA or some other regulations needs to be followed, you can easily replicate the DB into multiple regions and they manage all by it's own.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    I have not had to contact support for this service, however I have had to contact AWS for other services and their support has been good.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    We give the support a high rating simply because every time we've had issues or questions, representatives were in contact with us quickly. Without fail, our issues/questions were handled in a timely matter. That kind of response is integral when client data integrity and availability is in question. There is also a wealth of documentation for resolving issues on your own.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    The only thing that can be compared to DynamoDB from the selected services can be Aurora. It is just that we use Aurora for High-Performance requirements as it can be 6 times faster than normal RDS DB. Both of them have served as well in the required scenario and we are very happy with most of the AWS services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    We moved away from Oracle and NoSQL because we had been so reliant on them for the last 25 years, the pricing was too much and we were looking for a way to cut the cord. Snowflake is just too up in the air, feels like it is soon to be just another line item to add to your Azure subscription. Azure was just priced right, easy to migrate to and plenty of resources to hire to support/maintain it. Very easy to learn, too.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Amazon AWS
    I have taken one point away due to its size limits. In case the application requires queries, it becomes really complicated to read and write data. When it comes to extremely large data sets such as the case in my company, a third-party logistics company, where huge amount of data is generated on a daily basis, even though the scalability is good, it becomes difficult to manage all the data due to limits.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • Some developers see DynamoDB and try to fit problems to it, instead of picking the best solution for a given problem. This is true of any newer tool that people are trying to adopt.
    • It has allowed us to add more scalability to some of our systems.
    • As with any new technology there was a ramp up/rework phase as we learned best practices.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Perfect for small and medium databases, being very cost effective.
    • As a Platform as a Service, there is no concern about patches, upgrades and end of life.
    • Be aware of security and network capabilities. The service cannot run in the VNET as Azure Virtual Machines do.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Amazon DynamoDB Screenshots

    Screenshot of Amazon DynamoDB in the AWS Console