TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Amazon DynamoDB

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AAmazon DynamoDB is a cloud-native, NoSQL, serverless database service.

    $0

    capacity unit per hour

    IBM Cloudant

    Score7.4 out of 10
    N/ACloudant is an open source non-relational, distributed database service that requires zero-configuration. It's based on the Apache-backed CouchDB project and the creator of the open source BigCouch project. Cloudant's service provides integrated data management, search, and analytics engine designed for web applications. Cloudant scales your database on the CouchDB framework and provides hosting, administrative tools, analytics and commercial support for CouchDB and BigCouch. Cloudant is often…

    $1

    per month per GB of storage above the included 20 GB

    Pricing
    Amazon DynamoDBIBM Cloudant
    Editions & Modules
    Provisioned - Read Operation
    $0.00013
    capacity unit per hour
    Provisioned - Write Operation
    $0.00065
    capacity unit per hour
    Provisioned - Global Tables
    $0.000975
    per Read Capacity
    On-Demand Streams
    $0.02
    per 100,000 read operations
    Provisioned - Streams
    $0.02
    per 100,000 read operations
    On-Demand Data Requests Outside AWS Regions
    $0.09
    per GB
    Provisioned - Data Requests Outside AWS Regions
    $0.09
    per GB
    On-Demand Snapshot
    $0.10
    per GB per month
    Provisioned - Snapshot
    $0.10
    per GB per month
    On-Demand Restoring a Backup
    $0.15
    per GB
    Provisioned - Restoring a Backup
    $0.15
    per GB
    On-Demand Point-in-Time Recovery
    $0.20
    per GB per month
    Provisioned - Point-in-Time Recovery
    $0.20
    per GB per month
    On-Demand Read Operation
    $0.25
    per million requests
    On-Demand Data Stored
    $0.25
    per GB per month
    Provisioned - Data Stored
    $0.25
    per GB per month
    On-Demand - Write Operation
    $1.25
    per million requests
    On-Demand Global Tables
    $1.875
    per million write operations replicated
    Standard
    $1
    per month per GB of storage above the included 20 GB
    Standard
    $75
    per month 100 reads/second ; 50 writes/second ; 5 global queries/second
    Lite
    Free
    20 reads/second ; 10 writes/second ; 5 global queries / second ; 1 GB of storage capacity
    Standard
    Included
    per month 20 GB of storage
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Amazon DynamoDBIBM Cloudant
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Amazon DynamoDBIBM Cloudant
    Considered Both Products
    Amazon AWS
    Chose Amazon DynamoDB
    When compared to SQL and many other No SQL databases out in the market, I guess DynamoDB is a perfect stack for developing quick websites. More than that it's highly scalable which is offered by DynamoDB
    Incentivized
    IBM
    Chose IBM Cloudant
    For the first several months, we ran our projects on AWS, and in order to construct a faster connection experience on data processing, we choose DynamoDB which is one of Amazon's products as well. However, after migrating to Softlayer and being recommended by the sales …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Cloudant
    It's easier to use than Dynamo, more open than Firebase, and has better documentation that CouchDB... it might not be fair to compare Modulus, Modulus obviously suffers from some scalability issues and might not be in the same class... but its a hosted DB service we had some …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Cloudant
    I have used MongoDB prior to using Cloudant. For me Cloudant is a winner because the learning curve is not as steep as MongoDB. I also looked into using DynamoDB (AWS) but the set up was quite complicated so I gave up and tried to use Cloudant.
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Cloudant
    We looked for alternatives but the best documented and well presented tool was Cloudant for our use case.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    46 Answers
    86%
    Would buy again
    6 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    43 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    45 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    7 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    38 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    7 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    93%
    Implementation went as expected
    39 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    Features
    Amazon DynamoDBIBM Cloudant
    NoSQL Databases
    Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Amazon DynamoDB and IBM Cloudant
    Feature
    Amazon DynamoDB
    9.2
    69 Ratings
    4% above category average
    IBM Cloudant
    9.1
    21 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Performance9.368 Ratings9.721 Ratings
    Availability9.569 Ratings8.321 Ratings
    Concurrency9.067 Ratings9.821 Ratings
    Security9.269 Ratings8.221 Ratings
    Scalability9.468 Ratings9.021 Ratings
    Data model flexibility8.266 Ratings9.821 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility10.023 Ratings9.021 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Amazon DynamoDBIBM Cloudant
    Small Businesses
    Redis Software
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Redis Software
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Amazon DynamoDB
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Amazon DynamoDB
    Score8.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Amazon DynamoDBIBM Cloudant
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (79 ratings)
    7.0
    (45 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (34 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    7.7
    (5 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    9.1
    (42 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.2
    (4 ratings)
    8.6
    (4 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (4 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.5
    (3 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.1
    (42 ratings)
    9.6
    (23 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Amazon DynamoDBIBM Cloudant
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    It’s great for server less and real-time applications. It would be great for gaming and mobile apps. However, if you need relational database and have fixed budget, do not use it. While budget can be managed, you need to be careful. Also this is not a tool for storing big data, there are other wide-column database types you could use for it ins the ad
    Read full review
    IBM
    Our organization found Cloudant most suitable if One, a fixed pricing structure would make the most sense, for example in a situation where the project Cloudant is being used in makes its revenue in procurement or fixed retainer — thus the predictability of costs is paramount; Two, where you need to frequently edit the data and/or share access to the query engine to non-engineers — this is where the GUI shines.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • To manage varying workloads, it enables users to increase capacity as necessary and decrease it as needed.
    • Users can take advantage of its auto-scaling, in-memory caching, and backup without paying for the services of a database administrator.
    • We can use it for low scale operations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • For us, performance and scalability is the key, and Cloudant DB backed by CouchDB is scalable and performant.
    • IBM Cloudant dB is very easy to provision for sandbox, development, QA as well as production.
    • Support for Java for CouchDB app server analytics enables a greater control for over developers.
    • Schema free oriented very easy to program and build applications on it.
    • We love it!!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • Cost model may not be easy to control and may lead to higher costs if not carefully planned
    • Indexing may be a cost culprit when not planned, because it's not included on the data costs
    • The Query Language may not fulfill everybody's expectations, as it has less features than those of competitors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • It was only after we went with the cloud-based solution that IBM rolled out an on-premise version.
    • We found that a 3rd-party ODBC driver was required for a few applications that needed to pull data out of Cloudant.
    • The sales process was difficult because the salesperson we used was not as versed on Cloudant as I had hoped.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Amazon AWS
    It's core to our business, we couldn't survive without it. We use it to drive everything from FTP logins to processing stories and delivering them to clients. It's reliable and easy to query from all of our pipeline services. Integration with things like AWS Lambda makes it easy to trigger events and run code whenever something changes in the database.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    the flexibility of NoSQL allow us to modify and upgrade our apps very fast and in a convenient way. Having the solution hosted by IBM is also giving us the chance to focus on features and the improvement of our apps. It's one thing less to be worried about
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    Functionally, DynamoDB has the features needed to use it. The interface is not as easy to use, which impacts its usability. Being familiar with AWS in general is helpful in understanding the interface, however it would be better if the interface more closely aligned with traditional tools for managing datastores.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    It's mostly just a straight forward API to a data store. I knock one off for the full text search thing, but I don't need it much anyways. Also, the dashboard UI they give is pretty nice to use. It provides syntax-highlighting for writing views and queries are easy to test. I wish other DBs had a UI like this.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    it is a highly available solution in the IBM cloud portfolio and hence we have never had any issues with the data base being available - we also do continuous replication to be on the safer side just in case some thing goes awry. We also perform twice a year disaster recovery tests.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Amazon AWS
    It works very well across all the regions and response time is also very quick due to AWS's internal data transfer. Plus if your product requires HIPPA or some other regulations needs to be followed, you can easily replicate the DB into multiple regions and they manage all by it's own.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    very easy to get started and is very developer friendly given that it uses couchDB analytics. It is a cloud based solution and hence there is no hardware investment in a server and staging the server to get started and the associated delays/bureaucracy involved to get started. Good documentation is also available.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    I have not had to contact support for this service, however I have had to contact AWS for other services and their support has been good.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Very happy by the commitment given by the team which has been really good over the last 7 years of usage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    online resources are good enough to understand but there is nothing like testing. In our case, we discovered some not documented behavior that we take in count now. Also, the experience in NodeJs is critical. Also, take in count that most of the "good practices" with cloudant are not in online courses but in blogs and pages from independent developers
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    • Test the architecture on CouchDB helped us to address initial design flaws.
    • The migration to Cloudant as such was very painless.
    • We have migrate our replication system to Cloudant Android Sync for mobile devices.
    • We have regular informal contact with the Cloudant leadership to discuss our use cases and implementation strategies.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    The only thing that can be compared to DynamoDB from the selected services can be Aurora. It is just that we use Aurora for High-Performance requirements as it can be 6 times faster than normal RDS DB. Both of them have served as well in the required scenario and we are very happy with most of the AWS services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    The feature-set, including security, is very comparable. Overall, IBM's services added to the product are mature and stable, although product support and engineers could be a little better. Global availability is improving, and Disaster Recover Capabilities are great. Overall, it's very comparable to MongoDB as a DBaaS offer, available globally and with great documentation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Amazon AWS
    I have taken one point away due to its size limits. In case the application requires queries, it becomes really complicated to read and write data. When it comes to extremely large data sets such as the case in my company, a third-party logistics company, where huge amount of data is generated on a daily basis, even though the scalability is good, it becomes difficult to manage all the data due to limits.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    The service scales incredibly well. As you would expect from CloudDB and IBM combination. The only reason I wouldn't score it a 10 is the fact that document trees can get nested and nested very quickly if you are attempting to do very complex datasets. Which makes your code that much more complex to deal. Its very possible we could find a solution to this problem with better database planning to begin with, but one of the reasons we chose a service over a self-hosted solution was so we could set it up quick and forget about it. So we weren't going to dedicate a team to architecture optimization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • Some developers see DynamoDB and try to fit problems to it, instead of picking the best solution for a given problem. This is true of any newer tool that people are trying to adopt.
    • It has allowed us to add more scalability to some of our systems.
    • As with any new technology there was a ramp up/rework phase as we learned best practices.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • IBM Cloudant is very secure and we never have to worry about losing data/unauthorized access
    • It is one of the best data backup system and works well
    • Global availability means it is easy to connect to the nearest data center and this reduces load time which is great.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Amazon DynamoDB Screenshots

    Screenshot of Amazon DynamoDB in the AWS Console