Altova RaptorXML Server vs. Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Altova RaptorXML Server | Score10 out of 10 | N/A | Altova RaptorXML Server delivers validation and processing of XML, XBRL, and JSON data. RaptorXML Server is the third generation XML processor from Altova, recently optimized for parallel computing, based on the vendor's 15-year experience with XML and related standards. | N/A |
Mirantis Kubernetes Engine | Score9.4 out of 10 | N/A | The Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise, acquired by Mirantis in November 2019)aims to let users ship code faster. Mirantis Kubernetes Engine gives users one set of APIs and tools to deploy, manage, and observe secure-by-default, certified, batteries-included Kubernetes clusters on any infrastructure: public cloud, private cloud, or bare metal. | $500 per year per node |
| Altova RaptorXML Server | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | These pricing options are compatible with Linux or Windows Server and are per year, per node. The basic version requires maximum online purchase not to exceed 50 nodes. Support/professional services are not included. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Altova RaptorXML Server | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ![]() No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 83% Would buy again 5 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 80% Delivers good value for the price 4 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 6 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Altova RaptorXML Server | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | ![]() .NET Score8.7 out of 10 | Portainer Score9.6 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | AWS Auto Scaling Score9.2 out of 10 | Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Score8.5 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling Score8.5 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service Score7.4 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Altova RaptorXML Server | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 8.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.1 |
| Usability | - | 8.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 7.8 |
| Altova RaptorXML Server | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | ![]() No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots |



