ALTO Drill vs. GEOVIA Surpac

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ALTO Drill
Score 0.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
The legal and regulatory regime under which oil and gas companies operate is very complex. ALTO Drill promises to mitigate your drilling risks by allowing cross-functional teams (Geologists, Exploitation/Completions, Production Engineers, Surface and Mineral land, Drilling, Construction) to collaborate electronically removing communication silos and improving process efficiencies. Integrate, track and manage the cross-functional workflow from identification of a prospect through to…N/A
GEOVIA Surpac
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
GEOVIA Surpac from Dassault Systemes is a geology and mine planning application featuring 3D modeling and graphics and workflow automation.N/A
Pricing
ALTO DrillGEOVIA Surpac
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ALTO DrillGEOVIA Surpac
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ALTO DrillGEOVIA Surpac
User Ratings
ALTO DrillGEOVIA Surpac
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ALTO DrillGEOVIA Surpac
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
I have only used it for exploration projects but understand that with additional modules (such as pit design and production rates) it can be used for production schedules too. The software acts as a central interface for all of the drilling data from the borehole trace with customisable graphics or traces alongside (e.g.: geology, mag sus, assay results, struc info, etc) to the exporting of sections for field interp or planning; and resource block modeling.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Sections
  • Tracing borehole logs with graphically presented data
  • Linking/mapping of data sets
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Interface is good, but could always be improved
  • Occasionally a little buggy when mapping DBs
  • Extensive additional module list; can customise experience and therefore cost but some would expect certain features as standard
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Lower cost and more user-friendly. My understanding is that the functionality is somewhat more limited but for our use in exploration it does the job and does it very well.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Saved consultancy fees in interp and modelling.
  • Field-based interp made easier with fast and accurate section drawing.
  • Central interface for all data.
Read full review
ScreenShots