ALPI Caneco vs. ARCHICAD

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Caneco
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
A CAD suite for the electrical industry (design offices, installers, contracting authorities and inspection bodies), enabling engineers to design, quote, build and check their installations. Caneco integrates 2D/3D modeling, costing, calculation, cabinet layout, schematic and neutrality functions to provide tools to manage a project in its entirety.N/A
ARCHICAD
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
ARCHICAD is a 3D architectural design application and BIM from Graphisoft, a Nemetschek Group company headquartered in Budapest.
$240
per month
Pricing
ALPI CanecoARCHICAD
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Archicad Solo Version
$240
per month
Archicad Full Version
$280
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CanecoARCHICAD
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ALPI CanecoARCHICAD
Features
ALPI CanecoARCHICAD
Computer-Aided Design Software
Comparison of Computer-Aided Design Software features of Product A and Product B
ALPI Caneco
-
Ratings
ARCHICAD
7.1
Ratings
0% below category average
3D Modeling00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
2D Drafting00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Rendering and Visualization00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Parametric Design00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Collaboration and Sharing00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Compatibility with other software and formats00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Assembly Design00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Simulation and Analysis00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Documentation and Annotation00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Customization and Extensions00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ALPI CanecoARCHICAD
Small Businesses
Onshape
Onshape
Score 9.9 out of 10
Onshape
Onshape
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Onshape
Onshape
Score 9.9 out of 10
Onshape
Onshape
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Rhino
Rhino
Score 9.1 out of 10
Rhino
Rhino
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ALPI CanecoARCHICAD
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ALPI CanecoARCHICAD
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Best suited with: 1) High quality RAM 2) First time users on architectural design 3) Quick layouts with customization Not suitable for: 1) [If] more flexibility in design is required 2) Less RAM 3) Transferring standard details into a project
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Design modeling: the user interface allows for a pretty intuitive and integrated creative process. It's great for exploring and communicating ideas, and in cases where the process is not inhibited by the need to switch to different software for different stages of work, such as when moving to develop the design in detail. It also allows for a much more seamless process when changes are requested, so that all material from initial visualizations all the way through to detailed design information are all always in sync and up to date. No redundancy of effort is triggered through the logistics of needing to pass the design through multiple software platforms (eg Sketchup => Revit =>AutoCAD) as each design iteration evolves.
  • Design documentation: it's reasonably clear that ArchiCAD has the best implementation of BIM in the architectural domain, compared with the nearest rival Revit, and is unmatched for design development and coordination between disciplines, supporting large multidisciplinary teams who can all work simultaneously via the cloud or a local server on the same integrated model.
  • Somewhat responsive developers: unlike some others, if an issue is reported, there seems to be a fair chance of the developers engaging with the user and for the issue to be addressed in a subsequent update.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Increasing the size of the files in ArchiCAD to allow it to be used for more complex applications can be more comfortable and user-friendly.
  • Improving it to support more tutorials, add-ons, resources, and e-books.
  • Withholding releasing and developing new software and concentrating on improving the existing version can greatly help in the life of architecture and engineering.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
We have rapid responses from their support team, and they often go the extra mile to pinpoint the root cause of an issue and assist the team in resolving it. They are honest when a problem is down to user error, or a glitch on the version we are on.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
AutoCAD uses line works in actual presentation whiles ARCHICAD uses real structural walls which are easy to use and present compared to line works. Revit largely and mainly focused on structural design and is more complex to use compared to ARCHICAD which helps one focus on different aspects of drawing and is easy to integrate with rendering software like Lumion 360 panorama.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • The low multi-year cost is a huge savings, compared to more popular competitors, the total cost of ownership is about 1/4 of an Autodesk design suite.
  • An effective training program can be implemented in under 40 hours/employee to reach intermediate level, as the intuitive interface is easy to teach. This appears to be significantly less, perhaps 1/3 of competing software.
  • The underdog element is still an obstacle, as converting ArchiCAD projects to Revit for our Consultants is a challenge. While ArchiCAD outputs perfectly good IFC (industry-standard BIM interchange format) files, Revit has yet to import them 100% correctly. Therefore, working with others takes a bit more overhead than when using Revit.
Read full review
ScreenShots