TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack Platform

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/AGuardicore is a segmentation company, now part of Akamai since the late 2021 acquisition, aiming to displace legacy firewalls. The Guardiocre software-only approach is decoupled from the physical network to provide a faster alternative to firewalls. It is built for the agile enterprise that offers greater security and visibility in the cloud, data-center and endpoint.N/A

    Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack Platform

    Score3.8 out of 10
    N/AThe Kaspersky Anti Targeted Attack Platform uses machine learning approaches to detect targeted attacks across network telemetry through a combination of automated network traffic analysis, correlative behavioral analysis, and other approaches to detect multi-layer threats across an enterprise network.N/A
    Pricing
    Akamai Guardicore SegmentationKaspersky Anti Targeted Attack Platform
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Akamai Guardicore SegmentationKaspersky Anti Targeted Attack Platform
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Akamai Guardicore SegmentationKaspersky Anti Targeted Attack Platform
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
    Score8.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Akamai Guardicore SegmentationKaspersky Anti Targeted Attack Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    3.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Akamai Guardicore SegmentationKaspersky Anti Targeted Attack Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Akamai
    This is the best possible solution for enterprise-level organizations where server counts will be in the thousands. To manage these and understand the communication can be very cumbersome without this tool. Ease of creation map zone and application-wise can be relaxing to OS teams and support teams as well. There is no limit to labeling schema of servers and it gives the freedom to do so.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Kaspersky Lab
    I would say it is less appropriate for an organization which is looking to implement a tool within a short period of time. However, we found support on the web forum as well as from support team and were given solutions always. It was somewhat a relief for the users. We were not in a position to provide further IT security resources. And Anti Targeted Attack Platform did not require such. The tool was able to identify and eliminate a critical threat right after the implementation.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Akamai
    • Network traffic flow within environment of organization.
    • Creating maps for visibility and drill down is a key feature.
    • Labelling of servers can be done via running script.
    • Alerts can be sensitized for the traffic not seen.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Kaspersky Lab
    • Complex attacks are identified frequently.
    • Advanced thread intelligence.
    • Privacy of all data is very well maintained.
    Read full review
    Cons
    Akamai
    • Limited support to legacy infrastructure.
    • Integration with third party is a bit tedious.
    • Awaiting support for Kubernetes in the next version.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Kaspersky Lab
    • False positives were identified frequently.
    • Implementing rules are a very complex process.
    • UI crashes were spotted randomly.
    • Deployment needs to be much smoother.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Akamai
    The solution is deployed throughout the organization. Teams are working and integrating it with the help desk tool wherever required. Helps in identifying the network traffic flows in lateral movement and east and west as well. Allows policies by default and later fine-tuning to be done to narrow it and enforce blocking action. Exporting reports from the tool is easy and can be observed for any issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Kaspersky Lab
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Akamai
    Support has been available 24*7. It also depends on criticality but support is available. Also, the right expertise from the team helps in identifying the issue quickly and this helps in less production downtime if required. The ticket is resolved with RCA.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Kaspersky Lab
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Akamai
    1) No limit to labeling schema. 2) Ease of creating maps with respect to zone, environment, subnets, etc. 3) Ease of creating policies and publishing the same. 4) Deception 5) Integration with monitoring tool (grafana) 6) Changes in the agent can be considered if there are legacy systems, time-consuming but can be achieved with the right information.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Kaspersky Lab
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Akamai
    • Blocking unwarranted traffic can really boost security of organization.
    • Alerts can be triggered to SIEM servers and help in timely action.
    • Need to be very careful before configuring and publishing block policies in the production environment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Kaspersky Lab
    • Implementation did not go as planned. Therefore, time consumption was increased.
    • Since we moved out of the tool, we had to consider another which costed time.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots