Airtable is a project management and collaboration platform designed to enable content pipelines, product management, events planning, user research, and more. It combines spreadsheet,database, calendar, and kanban functionality within one platform.
$24
per month per user
Contractor Foreman
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Contractor Foreman is an online construction management software for contractors and boasts users among contractors in more than 75 countries.
$588
per year
Pricing
Airtable
Contractor Foreman
Editions & Modules
Team
$24
per month per user
Business
$54
per month per user
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Basic
$588
per year
Standard
$948
per year
Plus
$1,497
per year
Pro
$1,990
per year
Unlimited
$2,988
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Airtable
Contractor Foreman
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Plans are based on features and licenses needed. Plus, Pro, and Unlimited plans include a 100-day money back guarantee.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Airtable
Contractor Foreman
Features
Airtable
Contractor Foreman
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Airtable
7.1
Ratings
7% below category average
Contractor Foreman
-
Ratings
Task Management
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource Management
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow Automation
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Team Collaboration
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document Management
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email integration
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile Access
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Airtable
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
7.1
Ratings
7% below category average
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
5.50 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
7.80 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Airtable
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
6.5
Ratings
16% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
6.10 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
00 Ratings
6.30 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
00 Ratings
4.50 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Airtable
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
7.5
Ratings
4% above category average
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Airtable
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
6.7
Ratings
13% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
6.60 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
6.60 Ratings
Data exportability
00 Ratings
6.60 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Airtable
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
7.1
Ratings
6% below category average
Plan distribution & viewing
00 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
00 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
Photo documentation
00 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
Jobsite reports
00 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Document sharing
00 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
RFI tools
00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
00 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
Mobile app
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Submittal design and management
00 Ratings
6.70 Ratings
Checklists
00 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Meeting Minutes
00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Specifications
00 Ratings
7.40 Ratings
Change orders
00 Ratings
6.90 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Airtable is well suited for cross-functional teams who all have an interest in data site - it's democratizing who owns data. Especially if there will be a need to add input on a cell-level basis view comment functionality with the expectation of @mentioned parties respond. Airtable is less suited for teams who need to run functions, jobs, and macros across a data set; they're best suited for Excel.
Contractor Foreman works well for subcontractors and GC’s who don’t have the budget for higher-priced platforms (like Procore) but still need estimating, scheduling, daily logs, change orders, and job costing in one system. For example, a 10–25 person construction company can replace separate tools (Excel, QuickBooks, text messaging, and whiteboard schedules) with Contractor Foreman and immediately improve organization and accountability.
Airtable has capabilities commonly found in spreadsheet applications, but also has some of the features found in databases.
The ability to filter fields. I set up a filter on the status field, so when a project is marked, complete, on hold, or canceled, that record is hidden from my current projects table view. If it is marked complete, the record is moved to the completed projects table view. In this way I can easily access a record of past projects
Being able to duplicate tables and create alternate views
Collapse and expand records. When I collapse the rows, I can easily scan current projects, next steps, project status, and due dates. When I expand the row, or field, I can see more detailed information about that field or record very easily. I can also expand or open the entire record. This is is helpful, when I am entering a lot of information to multiple fields in that record.
Airtable does not integrate with collaboration services with which it is possible to review live changes within each spreadsheet (in the case of keeping them closed).
Does not automate analysis traffic.
It does not include any section where it is possible to communicate with the other editors.
We love Airtable for how we use it and we know there are probably tons of other ways we can implement it for other departments. We just haven't gotten there yet (due to bandwith) Customer Support is also super helpful and overall ease of use is fantastic
Airtable is a simple and intuitive tool. However, when you first set it up, you need someone who is curious and able to design a system that works for your organisation's use case. This takes some time, but it can be intuitive once it's set up.
Mostly great, especially for the price. The features appear to have definitely been designed by a team with a depth of construction specific experience. I also highly rate the usability because of the vast vast amount of customizability inherent in the system. It appears that almost all forms and features are customabizable on the company level and even specific to different individual users.
I have rarely experience downtime, compared to other tools, and given how much time we spend on the tool. Even if there were to be, their updates on it are very timely, and our support team are able to provide any questions regarding
I never had any issues with load time, even with the integrations that we use today (google sheets) However, I'm curious if adding additional layers of integrations would slow down performance. We do carry quite a bit of data in Airtable, but, again, no impact on overall performance
Many times we had issues that turned out to be errors and bugs. At first, we would be told forcefully that there were no bugs, then we would document them, and we would get an acknowledgement but no apology for essentially either gaslighting us or being ignorant of their system
Airtable has great support. They have a variety of support features to answer any questions. They have great self teaching instructions for templates and product tours. They also have support for teams and project management. They also have a fantastic customer help line. They are able and willing to answer customer questions and never have customers waiting long
Absolutely top notch! They were always there to help and immediately. Very happy with the communication they provided and the knowledge they had of their product. I would venture to say that they are one of the best in terms of support in their space.
Recorded trainings were provided by the Airtable team. Great as an evergreen resources to new team members and for anyone that wants to refresh their Airtable knowledge
Training all users was an important part of the implementation, which did take considerable time and effort. At first glance without training, the content calendar can be overwhelming because of the amount of data. The features within Airtable seem to be endless but our team was able to identify the most important to be successful.
Airtable is the most user-friendly and adaptive. It's UX/UI is the most aesthetically pleasing (which matters a lot if its what you're staring at every day), and the customizability of having different views and perspectives of the same record is extremely helpful. It's also a great cloud-based storage place for marketing materials, as it goes beyond simple storage - you can group together, make notes, connect, and comment on assets.
I used Projul and Buildium when I was primarily managing rental properties rather than full home builds. Projul was great for estimating and invoicing, while Buildium served its purpose well at the time. Now, as a small construction company, Contractor Foreman provides everything we need in one platform, making project management much more efficient.
There are TONS of opportunity to scale, but I think it's a matter if you have the time and resources to do so because the initial setup can be fairly time consuming and prioritized dedication
Through this platform, I always have the idea bout which of my team member is working on which particular part of the project, I can easily track their progress, and also I can easily correct them where it is required by adding sticky notes, by sending the attachments and URLs.
Cost Savings. Integration with QuickBooks and Bills improved financial control. 0-15% cost savings per project.
Time Savings: Streamlined project management led to a 20-30% reduction in administrative time, boosting on-site productivity, and with project tracking a 15-20% reduction in project delays.
Enhanced Collaboration: Centralized documentation and real-time updates improved team communication, increasing collaboration by 5-10%.
Overall, CF has provided a 10-15% return on investment annually through increased efficiency and cost control.