AgilePoint NX is a business process management platform that allows companies to create business applications and workflows without writing code. The product consists of an App Builder, an eForm Builder, a field-mapping utility, and reporting and analytics.
N/A
Appian
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Appian is a low-code development and business process management platform. It features drag-and-drop design for app building, automated work processes, unified data management, and cloud-based deployment.
$0
Pricing
AgilePoint NX
Appian
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Appian Community Edition
$0
Application - Input-Only
$2
per month per user
Application - Infrequent
$9
per month per user
Application - Standard
$75
per month per user
Platform
Custom Quote Priced per user with unlimited apps.
minimum 100 users, no maximum
Unlimited
Custom Quote Priced per development with unlimited apps.
unlimited
Platform
Custom Quote Priced per user with unlimited apps.
Minimum 100, no maximum
Unlimited
Custom Quote Priced per development with unlimited apps.
Unlimited
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AgilePoint NX
Appian
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AgilePoint NX
Appian
Features
AgilePoint NX
Appian
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
AgilePoint NX
10.0
1 Ratings
20% above category average
Appian
-
Ratings
Dashboards
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
AgilePoint NX
10.0
1 Ratings
18% above category average
Appian
-
Ratings
Process designer
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process simulation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Business rules engine
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process player
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for modeling languages
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form builder
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Model execution
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
AgilePoint NX
10.0
1 Ratings
17% above category average
Appian
-
Ratings
Social collaboration tools
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
AgilePoint NX
10.0
1 Ratings
20% above category average
Appian
-
Ratings
Content management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
If you have a lot of different systems and software AgilePoint can likely tie it all together and make communicating a lot easier. It is well suited for those that use SharePoint or SQL databases. AgilePoint's ability to connect with the different database types makes it really easy to implement applications.
Appian works great for automating manual processes and integrating multiple systems through its toolset. It gives great flexibility for establishing rules for approvals, routings, escalations, and the like. Because of the low code toolset, it's very easy to deploy and make changes as needed as processes evolve and as the organization learns to utilize the system better. Minimal maintenance is required to support the applications build on the platform. Some of the automated testing integration with tools like Jenkins is limited so that may be an issue for some.
Allows at a glance workflow documentation which assists in the need we have for information readiation.
Drag and drop interface for workflow development greatly speeds our apps time to market.
Using the advanced features of Appian, we are able to create working sites in a fraction of the time it would take to do so using "traditional" development.
Search issues when type ahead and database search are used in the same field.
Buttons implementation where user is require[d] to click on the button description - if clicks on the button outside that text - button will not work.
Problems with using certain off-the-shelf performance tools like WebLoad or Neoload. That is because of different dynamic variables being used internally in Appian - which these tools are unable to correlate. We are still investigating using other tools like Jmeter to overcome dynamic correlation problem for performance testing.
We recently renewed our license with Appian. We are convinced that its flexibility, relative ease of use, the support they provide, there mobile advancements and their general willingness and desire to see us succeed all contributed to our reason to renew our agreement with Appian
Appian is a low code environment, because of this, a very good visual interface is required. Appian is providing a feature-rich dashboard [that] we can use for building the dashboards and other interfaces. Appian also provides patches and releases to enhance these features. A developer can start off development just by going through a basic course from the Appian learning community.
Appian is one of the leading low code business automation platforms that support RPA, decision rules, case management, workflow automation, and machine learning all in a single bundle. But it is also harder to implement and replace the traditional business process.
As analyst I participated in a developer boot camp. At times it was hard to keep up but most of the time it made sense. Trainer took the time to explain and slowed pace down to answer questions etc.
Appian has enormously transformed and keeps on updating the product every quarter to meet the latest needs of the world with new innovations & technologies being integrated within the platform. What gives more pleasure than a product that keeps on continuous[ly] improv[ing]?
I believe it has negatively impacted our release dates. There may have been a misunderstanding as to the learning curve, even though it is "low code."
The look and feel of the applications created using Appian have uniformity and it's easier to have "reuse" between applications.
There is less developer control when it comes to features. I think this mainly has to do with the amount of plugins available. I would think there should be many more available plugins. But again, our use case is probably different than most others.