TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Agile Hive - SAFe in Jira

    Score7.4 out of 10
    N/AThe world of work is constantly changing. Agile work processes in particular are becoming increasingly popular. Even large companies are trying to introduce agile working methods. For many, the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is the right solution for their agile teams. However, implementing SAFe with all its features such as providing reports, visualizing dependencies and automated documentation is not always easy in reality. Many companies spend a lot of time and money searching for the right…N/A

    Rally Software

    Score6.8 out of 10
    N/ARally Software headquartered in Boulder, Colorado developed the Rally agile software development / ALM platform which was acquired by CA Technologies and rebranded as CA Agile Central. After CA's acquisition by Broadcom the software was once again rebranded as Rally.N/A
    Pricing
    Agile Hive - SAFe in JiraRally Software
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Agile Hive - SAFe in JiraRally Software
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Agile Hive - SAFe in JiraRally Software
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Agile Hive - SAFe in Jira and Rally Software
    Feature
    Agile Hive - SAFe in Jira
    7.8
    1 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Rally Software
    -
    Ratings
    Task Management7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Resource Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Gantt Charts7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Support for Agile Methodology9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Visual planning tools8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Agile Development
    Comparison of Agile Development features of Agile Hive - SAFe in Jira and Rally Software
    Feature
    Agile Hive - SAFe in Jira
    10.0
    1 Ratings
    20% above category average
    Rally Software
    -
    Ratings
    Velocity Calculation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dependencies and Blockers10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Agile Hive - SAFe in JiraRally Software
    Small Businesses
    monday dev
    Score8.9 out of 10
    monday dev
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Planview AgilePlace
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Planview AgilePlace
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Planview AgilePlace
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Planview AgilePlace
    Score9.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Agile Hive - SAFe in JiraRally Software
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (4 ratings)
    7.0
    (17 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.6
    (5 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.7
    (5 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Agile Hive - SAFe in JiraRally Software
    Likelihood to Recommend
    //SEIBERT/MEDIA
    Agile Hive is used for our value train
    within a SAFe setup. Every quarter we organize a so-called Product Increment
    (PI) Planning, where we plan all Features and Enablers in Agile Hive.
    Based on the priority of the Product Manager all teams plan their Features and
    Enablers accordingly to the sprints that are determined by the Release Train
    Engineer and set up in Agile Hive. The teams then create User Stories and
    estimate them and based on their sprint velocity (defined in Agile Hive)
    Product Owners can see how many Features and Enablers are realistic in one
    quarter (Product Increment). Further, dependencies across teams can be defined
    and made visible in Agile Hive, so that the plan is feasible. Without Agile
    Hive it would be hard or impossible to plan across several teams within a value
    train and to manage all dependencies. Additionally, with Agile Hive the plan is
    more realistic, so what can be achieved within one quarter in product
    development.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    Rally is well suited to help outline the specific tasks of a project, create timelines, indicate progress/status of tasks and provide views of team members' workloads. My team used it for our weekly stand up meetings in order to update one another on our progress, and our manager used it as a way to determine who had capacity for additional tasks. It facilitated our transition to a more agile work environment and we used it to implement 2 week "sprints".
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    //SEIBERT/MEDIA
    • Roadmapping in terms of defining epics and planning them across a timeline and across teams.
    • Showing dependencies within teams and across teams and over time horizon.
    • Create transparency throughout the product organization and teams about what is planned.
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    • There are dashboards that provide friendly and useful metrics at the team, program and portfolio levels which help get an easy and quick visual representation of what's going on.
    • Story management made easier, It offers a quick way of quickly entering a number of user stories without losing the overview, by just typing the title and selecting a few attributes directly in the overview screen.
    • Sprint management is seamless in CA Agile Central . It allows you to drag stories from the backlog to the sprints and back again. When a story is dragged into an sprint, it automatically checks the velocity for that sprint and indicates how many more story points can be chipped in. No more manual checking needed by scrum master with respect to allocation and team velocity.
    • Though CA Agile Central has many inbuilt apps, but it also has an App-SDK that allows you to build free app extensions using JavaScript and HTML. So, as per their needs, teams can customize & build various apps & dashboards.
    • Dashboard is an awesome feature which allows you to select and drag panels with all kinds of graphical information about the current sprints and releases.
    • It offers tremendous support for scaled Agile & almost all scaling frameworks are supported specifically tuned to SAFe .
    • CA Agile Central includes several applications but it also integrates well with Jira, Confluence, Jenkins, Eclipse, Subversion, IBM, HP, Salesforce.com and many other products to allow users to organize projects to their specifications. So you can still use Jira at a team level & CA Agile Central at the program & portfolio level for efficient tracking & management.
    • The custom tags are very helpful in segregating the user stories based on the project needs. Even though it's a very small feature, it is very effective ( you will realize why specifically if you are using Jira).
    • CA Central Agile enables agile delivery with ease and provides comprehensive features to track time-boxes, Work In Progress items of the forecast increments.
    • Backlog management is hassle free since you can either drag and drop your user stories to the desired position on the backlog, or change a setting and manually enter priorities as a number.
    Read full review
    Cons
    //SEIBERT/MEDIA
    • I believe the training and support could be more hands on and easier.
    • The Agile Hive - SAFe in Jira product can be a bit robust to understand.
    • Having Knowledge transfer videos can help more than documentations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    • User management is pretty basic and could be better. For example more filters and reports and more ability to do mass updates.
    • The report generator is very, very basic and is not WYSIWYG. It has limited filters to generate reports. Often a Scrum master will need to export data to Excel or a tool like Crystal Reports to get enhanced reporting capability.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    //SEIBERT/MEDIA
    No answers on this topic
    Broadcom
    • To keep connecting my people, platform, and process for faster, smarter, better results.
    • Making the right contribution to the community. Use Agile and Lean processes to manage the work of your team.
    • Once you have tasted the positive result with Rally Software, you don't want to give up and come back to the old school of development pain any more.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    //SEIBERT/MEDIA
    It has in general a good usability, but there are some downsides, the big picture view of the entire product increment is too static, so there is no zoom in or zoom out. Mostly throughout planning it is necessary to zoom in to a sprint level and manage the user stories there. Also, the pig picture view has some limitations, because you cannot read the entire user story name (boxes are too small).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    Great UI, recent refresh was terrific. Great graphs and metrics, inline editing for updates, and a multitude of views on sprint progress make for a great team collaboration experience. There is also an active community and forums so that if you do need help, it is readily available
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    //SEIBERT/MEDIA
    No answers on this topic
    Broadcom
    Don’t recall ever being unavailable.
    Read full review
    Performance
    //SEIBERT/MEDIA
    No answers on this topic
    Broadcom
    The screens render relatively quickly but many actions that you would expect to require a single click require multiple clicks and pop-up windows. The extra windows and clicks make the product feel ponderous.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    //SEIBERT/MEDIA
    No answers on this topic
    Broadcom
    I've had to use support only one time and my issue was eventually resolved but not because of my ticket--because others complained about the functionality taken away so they brought it back. My ticket was never answered or addressed. So I can't really say much for the support factor for Rally.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    //SEIBERT/MEDIA
    No answers on this topic
    Broadcom
    It more or less confirmed that we are using it the way they had in mind. We were hoping for a epiphany in terms of how we could use it better.

    They also want to be a go to source for agile processes and have an online resource center. It’s not that great but had a couple of nuggets. It hasn’t really helped us too much and we are not too far off from the classical interpretation of agile.

    I would recommend training, in particular for organizations that multiple on-going projects. The product seems optimized for larger, more complex teams and getting proper training on how to configure, administer and use the system would be beneficial
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    //SEIBERT/MEDIA
    No answers on this topic
    Broadcom
    Implementation of RALLY services and program satisfaction among various group,... 1) Dev Outcomes: How were our resiliencies, development, learning & practitioners “make them do the work,” but that they ask you to do it “in a way like before. 2) The Ops group: Just wish to make sure any change won't break current production envirements All the stake holders has to be on the same page
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    //SEIBERT/MEDIA
    With Jira Software alone it is also possible to plan a SAFe product increment planning, but it would be nearly impossible to see the overall big picture of all product teams involved in a release train. So, the planning on sprint level for one team would be more efficient, but the planning for a whole quarter with all dependencies across teams would be not feasible to present. Therefore, Agile SAFe enables value trains an efficient way to plan a product increment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    It was a close race between Jama, JIRA and Rally. We decided to go for Jama as a requirements management tool and use Rally for Agile projects. The cost was another factor that made us select Rally.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    //SEIBERT/MEDIA
    • More transparency.
    • Better product decisions.
    • Saving time and resources.
    • Less critical dependencies.
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    • it helped organizing many of the processes management use to communicate tasks with engineers, and provided detailed charts on the speed/blockage during any iteration
    • with time Rally became the main tool we used to track and report tasks/defects in our projects, but frequent service outages made it very hard to continue consider as a reliable solution
    • too much features is good, but for engineers a few features (User Stories section, iterations, defects, and Kanban boards) are necessary and the rest is just noise
    • Kanban board support is lacking
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots