AdvoLogix vs. Intapp Time

IntApp time is well-suited for capturing time and automating that capture in some instances. It does not provide a wealth of information regarding the time it captures. For example, auto-detecting client/matter numbers based on past time entries. As mentioned, the timer functions of the product are well thought out, easy to use and popular among our timekeepers.

Incentivized

• It captures activity on your PC -- e.g. reading an e-mail, editing a document. It can be customized to track other activities -- e.g. if you use a particular PDF tool, or use a particular web site for legal research.
• It captures phone activity.
• It captures calendar appointments.
• It is really low maintenance, and seems to have a very light footprint on the client.

Incentivized

• Updating the product can be difficult due to IntApp's update methodology.
• There is no artificial intelligence capability in the product to assist timekeepers in entering time.
• Installation and testing of the product are complicated.

Incentivized

There are three competitors to Intapp Time that I know of, and have looked at, but it's been years. Those competitors are Element55, Aderant Found Time and Smart Time. Every time I compared any of those products to the current version of Intapp Time then Intapp Time came out on top. Element 55 seemed have a bit of a clunky interface when I last looked. Aderant Found Time seemed like a limited success at copying Intapp Time; the software itself seemed a little burdensome, both on the client and the back end.

Incentivized

• Saves valuable time that would otherwise be spent translating handwritten timekeeping notes into a database
• Allows my secretary to easily view my time and make corrections if necessary
• Saves our clients money by cutting down on unnecessary time spent tracking billables

Incentivized