Adguard vs. Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN

Adguard

Adguard

2 Reviews and Ratings

Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN

Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN

11 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Adguard	Score 8.0 out of 10	N/A	N/A	$2.49 per month
Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN	Score 7.8 out of 10	N/A	Prisma SD-WAN (formerly known as CloudGenix but now as Prisma from Palo Alto Networks since being acquired in April 2020) offers an Autonomous SD-WAN solution, designed to provide app-policies aligned to business intent, along with direct access to multi-cloud and dev-ops frameworks to deliver unparalleled productivity gains, and cost-savings compared to first generation SD-WAN alternatives.	N/A

Pricing

Adguard

Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN

Editions & Modules

Personal: $2.49
per month
Family: $5.49
per month

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Adguard	Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Adguard	Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN

Best Alternatives
	Adguard	Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Small Businesses	NinjaOne Score 9.1 out of 10	No answers on this topic
Medium-sized Companies	Cisco Meraki MX Score 9.1 out of 10	Cisco Meraki MX Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises	Cisco Meraki MX Score 9.1 out of 10	Cisco Meraki MX Score 9.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Adguard	Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (3 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	7.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Adguard	Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Likelihood to Recommend	Adguard No answers on this topic	Palo Alto Networks CloudGenix would be suited for any company that has an internet connection if you have multiple sites you could use this to help with network traffic and what should take precedence over other applications. If you didn't have various sites, you could go with another type of internet connection.CloudGenix may not be suited for that scenario. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Adguard No answers on this topic	Palo Alto Networks Circuit Monitoring QOS of network traffic High Availability Incentivized Dave King Director of IT Read full review
Cons	Adguard No answers on this topic	Palo Alto Networks Some warning messages are hard to pinpoint the actual issue. Support was faster at first, seems to not be as quick as in the beginning. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	Adguard No answers on this topic	Palo Alto Networks The support was super fast in the beginning. Sometimes it seems now that the support does not get back to you as quickly. When we do get in contact with the support, they are usually knowledgeable and can help find the problem. The support has also been easy to work with. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Adguard No answers on this topic	Palo Alto Networks We evaluated Silverpeaks and Cisco. We found that CloudGenics' had a pricing model that met our needs. The sales team we worked with went over our existing environment thoroughly to provide the right size solution without compromising or limiting our technology needs. While the overall solutions form each vendor would have worked, we simply believed CloudGenic was the right fit for our company based on price, sales, support, and functionality. Incentivized Dave King Director of IT Read full review
Return on Investment	Adguard No answers on this topic	Palo Alto Networks Reduced Down time Improved throughput due to their intelligent data analytics Full utilization of all data circuits Incentivized Dave King Director of IT Read full review
ScreenShots