Active Query Builder vs. DHTMLX

It is a good one for business users who are in no way technical and do not have any insights about the backend databases and do not have any SQL experience. They can simply go in and create queries without any SQL knowledge by just using a drag and drop way..now tell me how cool is that? :)

Incentivized

DHTMLX is an excellent choice for incorporating complex components into your website or platform. Its versatility and customization options make it suitable for various industries and use cases. With DHTMLX, you can seamlessly integrate sophisticated data grids, interactive charts, customizable UI controls, and dynamic calendars into your existing infrastructure. These components can be tailored to match your branding and design requirements, ensuring a seamless integration with your platform's aesthetics. Additionally, DHTMLX provides comprehensive documentation and responsive support, making it easy for developers to utilize the full potential of the components. In summary, DHTMLX offers the flexibility and functionality needed to enhance your software applications with powerful and visually appealing features.

• Safer way of extracting data without creation of user or providing access on the Sql server
• Using query builder to allow wide spectrum users to create dashboards
• Review the risk of data corruption

Incentivized

• Gantt: Moving tasks or entire projects
• Gantt: A linked grid to display resource load
• Gantt: Full control allowing you to decide how to implement
• Pricing was reasonable and we can upgrade to Enterprise by paying the difference if required.

Incentivized

• Improved query customization options.
• Aside from some missing documentation, the features are solid.
• Access control using either tokens or Jwt is a feature that may be enabled.

Incentivized

• We would like to have more cell controls (like a Date Time Picker, Date Range Picker)
• In the cell editing mode we would like to have a better integration into the Angular world

With regard to the two major components we used, namely the tabular representation and the graphical modeler, we were able to effectively replace the existing building blocks of our applications by integrating them. We were able to retain existing functionalities and benefit from a significant enhancement with what DHTMLX offers natively. This made it easy for us to get our end-users to adopt the change.

In contrast, Active Query Builder was less expensive, more rapidly implemented, and received universally positive feedback from consumers. I have found that it is hard to anticipate all of the different ways that end users would want to query their data, and although I am not opposed to designing new views for end-users, it is important to keep in mind that the preferences of a single user will not be shared by all. Due to its complete visual access, Active Query Builder is the optimal choice.

Incentivized

DHTMLX library boasts lots of readily available components that can be easily integrated into web applications. Each feature is equipped with a multitude of events and methods that provide developers with complete control over data manipulation and management. DHTMLX is more easy for building enterprise-level applications that require complex UI elements and data visualization.

Incentivized

• The tech depts were cleared faster and had high impact on quality
• Active Query Builder is the perfect solution, providing comprehensive visual access to data in a safe and controlled environment.

Incentivized

• Users appreciate the Spreadsheet like way of working with data
• Gantt charts are widely known and people like to work with them