Accurate Background vs. Sterling Check

It does the job well and delays are usually due to the counties not Accurate. It's significantly more expensive than its competitors. In my experience, I had a technical issue with the email to send out the background check form to candidates, and they could not solve it.

Incentivized

SterlingOne has had my background check in progress for nearly a month. I spoke with them 5 days ago about the issue and discovered there was a criminal record flag in Connecticut. I have never been to Connecticut. They said this can often happen if an individual has the same name, birthday, or last four digits of SSN. This is clearly a flaw in their system if someone with the same name or birthday can appear on the same background check. I feel bad for any John Smith who applies for a job with a company that uses SterlingOne, they'll never get past the screening. Not only is this a flawed system, but when I spoke with customer service about this, they guaranteed they would expedite this within 24-48 hours. It has now been 5 days and when I called back, they said they would expedite this as if I had never called in the first place. I have been through numerous background checks for work in my life, I have done live scans and had my fingerprints taken, and have been approved to work with children with special needs (which requires a very rigorous screening) and I have never experienced such a disjointed and unprofessional process.

• Comprehensive background check report
• Report tailored to your needs
• Weekly calls with Account Manager or as needed
• online chat option with customer service

Incentivized

• The initiation of a background check is very simple by only needing the name and email of the new candidate and submitting that as the new ticket.
• Sterling communicates with the new candidate to keep the background check moving which saves us time by not needing to keep a close eye on the process of the background check.
• Sterling communicates with the employer to let them know if additional charges are needed to run the background check and we can either approve or deny the charge.

Incentivized

• There is no direct way to reach the verifications team and having customer service as a middleman sometimes adds a delay.

Incentivized

• In my opinion, Horrible new platform "Sterling check"
• No designated account representative
• In my experience, Poor troubleshooting support
• Customer service often doesn't answer questions
• Many back and forth needed to resolve issues
• Recently changed platform and not offering the same services

Incentivized

• Sterling Talent is an excellent company for performing the background checks for our new hires. However, the delay in processing times can be improved.
• Also, there should be automation from legacy systems to pick up the candidate details as much as possible instead of asking for more details from the candidate via email.

Incentivized

More reliable and significantly better user experience compared to other products. Pricing structure also made it more affordable than competitors.

Incentivized

SterlingOne is easier to use and faster in response than HireRight. HireRight is also not great for international (non-US) candidates as the employment history and especially education results take a long while.

Incentivized

• Using Accurate has been an unnecessary painful experience so far.

• Quick results allow us to hire people in short time frames and get them onboarded quickly.
• The product, and the customer service team, doesn't require much management from a vendor relations perspective.

Incentivized