TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

ABBYY Mobile Web Capture vs. Appium

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    ABBYY Mobile Web Capture

    N/AN/AABBYY Mobile Web Capture is an SDK that helps users create smooth customer self-service experiences with automatic data capture within a mobile app, providing real-time recognition and capturing photos of documents for back-end processing.N/A

    Appium

    Score6.9 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A
    Pricing
    ABBYY Mobile Web CaptureAppium
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ABBYY Mobile Web CaptureAppium
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    User Ratings
    ABBYY Mobile Web CaptureAppium
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (9 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ABBYY Mobile Web CaptureAppium
    Likelihood to Recommend
    ABBYY
    No answers on this topic
    JS Foundation
    1. It's open source which supports range of languages, operating systems and languages. Well suited for Android and IOS mobile automation. Supports all kinds of apps, which makes it flexible and robust mobile testing tool 2. It is less appropriate where we need intercept network call to verify the API calls. Extensive coding experience is required to work Appium
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    ABBYY
    No answers on this topic
    JS Foundation
    • It uses WebDriver API so it makes it easy to use for former web test automation engineers.
    • It can be managed via the command line via an extensive set of parameters.
    • It handles implicit waits at the server side that is especially valuable in distributed infrastructure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    ABBYY
    No answers on this topic
    JS Foundation
    • Element browser sometimes is unreliable and has sporadic fails.
    • Appium running is a bit slow, compared to tests written with Appium and with Espresso or XCTest.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    ABBYY
    No answers on this topic
    JS Foundation
    I am rating 10/10 because Appium can use with multiple programming languages with multiple Test engines. Also, it works for both Android and iOS.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    ABBYY
    No answers on this topic
    JS Foundation
    I would like to give 9/10 rating to Appium because of it can easily integrate with popular frameworks and CI/CD tools, as well as it is reliable, flexible and easy to use. The setup can bit complex in initial step, but once on configured it's very easy to use and enables stable and scalable mobile automation for real and cloud devices.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    ABBYY
    No answers on this topic
    JS Foundation
    If you're an Apple developer, you use Xcode. It's practically a forced necessity. For system testing though, it doesn't have to be. You can have your development team focus on unit and integration tests in their platform and another team automate acceptance tests with a language they are more familiar with.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    ABBYY
    No answers on this topic
    JS Foundation
    • Appium is open source, so it's free. That's budget friendly right there.
    • The ability to write mobile automation tests has saved considerable time for our manual test team, but that is true with most automation tests.
    • We use Sauce Labs with our other automation, but Appium works great with Sauce Labs, as well, if I needed to run on emulators and simulators.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots