Aaniie Care vs. eClinicalWorks

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Aaniie Care
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
Aaniie Care is a cloud-based (SaaS) platform for home care providers. With automation, connected technologies, and proactive analytics, Aaniie Care helps providers produce better patient outcomes and simplify back-office functions. Features include dynamic scheduling, a mobile point-of-care app, CRM, and a hiring platform with automated applicant engagement, caregiver retention toolset, marketing automation, EVV, custom forms, patient and family portals, predictive analytics, automated…
$13
per month per client (for 21 or more clients at signing)
eClinicalWorks
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
eClinicalWorks headquartered in Westborough offers their EHR / EMR solution, which can be upgraded to a full practice management solution at higher pricing tiers.
$449
per month per provider
Pricing
Aaniie CareeClinicalWorks
Editions & Modules
All-inclusive
starting at $195
per month Up to 20 Clients at Signing
All-inclusive Pro
Starting at $13
per month per client (for 21 or more clients at signing)
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
RCM as a Service
2.9% of Practice Collections
EHR Only
$449
per month per provider
EHR With Practice Management
$599
per month per provider
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Aaniie CareeClinicalWorks
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Aaniie CareeClinicalWorks
Features
Aaniie CareeClinicalWorks
Billing and Claims Management
Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Product A and Product B
Aaniie Care
-
Ratings
eClinicalWorks
5.1
Ratings
39% below category average
Real-time eligibility verification00 Ratings5.10 Ratings
Claims management00 Ratings4.70 Ratings
Coding00 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Patient billing00 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Financial Reporting00 Ratings4.70 Ratings
Patient Scheduling
Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Aaniie Care
-
Ratings
eClinicalWorks
3.4
Ratings
80% below category average
Rule-based scheduling00 Ratings4.20 Ratings
Automated appointment reminders00 Ratings4.40 Ratings
Automated patient check-in00 Ratings2.10 Ratings
Multi-location support00 Ratings1.70 Ratings
Calendar interface00 Ratings4.60 Ratings
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Product A and Product B
Aaniie Care
-
Ratings
eClinicalWorks
3.4
Ratings
72% below category average
Charting / document management00 Ratings2.90 Ratings
Templates00 Ratings4.30 Ratings
Patient portal00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Mobile/tablet support00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Fax integration00 Ratings3.30 Ratings
Integration with other EMR and PM systems00 Ratings1.60 Ratings
Workflow automation00 Ratings1.60 Ratings
Speech recognition00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Customization00 Ratings2.10 Ratings
E-prescribing00 Ratings3.10 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Product A and Product B
Aaniie Care
-
Ratings
eClinicalWorks
3.8
Ratings
74% below category average
HIPAA compliance00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Role-based permission levels00 Ratings3.10 Ratings
Data backups and redundancy00 Ratings3.10 Ratings
Local mode / networking failsafe00 Ratings1.10 Ratings
Workflow and Scale
Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of Product A and Product B
Aaniie Care
-
Ratings
eClinicalWorks
2.1
Ratings
113% below category average
Task tracking00 Ratings2.10 Ratings
Specialty-specific workflows00 Ratings2.10 Ratings
Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities00 Ratings2.10 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Aaniie CareeClinicalWorks
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

athenaClinicals
athenaClinicals
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Epic
Epic
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Aaniie CareeClinicalWorks
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
2.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
2.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
2.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
4.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
2.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
4.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Aaniie CareeClinicalWorks
Likelihood to Recommend
I am not able to think of a scenario where Smartcare Software is less appropriate. All the scenarios that we use it for are appropriate and well-suited. We are very pleased with its user-friendliness, functionality and versatility and it allows us to function better and more efficiently than we would without it
Read full review
If you love clicking around in a pretty EMR all day long then this is the EMR for you. [However, I believe] if you are looking for efficiency and support, you should look elsewhere. [I feel] this is an EMR clearly designed by the tech world without much attention or care for those who use it and if you look at the reviews carefully you see that most of the people who love it are in IT.
Read full review
Pros
  • Scheduling
  • Communication
  • HR records
  • Client information and management
  • Notifications and alerts
  • Billing and invoicing
Read full review
  • Access to patient's records - obvious lack of file and charts; transportable ; multi user synchronous access
  • Produces clinical note as end product that is organized and "readable" as opposed to the gibberish output of many EMR's that look like a poorly formatted FORTRAN printouts
Read full review
Cons
  • Sometimes takes a long time to load
  • GPS not always accurate when recording clock-in location
  • Give us the option to show or hide client's phone number from caregiver shift reminder email
  • Provide the ability to tell when a message has been seen on the desktop version, just as we can in the app version
  • Update tutorials and training videos to keep up with the upgrades
Read full review
  • Meaningful Use Reports should be capturing data in real time and generated fairly quickly instead of the MAQ dashboard extraction process.
  • Their support teams are not very helpful at certain topics such as the definition/logic of Meaningful Use calculations. These are generally difficult to determine but several cases in regards to Meaningful Use take several days before it gets addressed.
  • Training videos would be helpful on their support website.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
If we had an option to easily switch to another EMR product we would. However, an EMR keeps you invested solidly in it - once you've started you're then going to be stuck with it. The investment into the data in the system are such that you have no real option to back out of what you are in and move into something else. Again, if we could, we would immediately move to another EMR. The ability to use it and be supported by the vendor has decreased nearly to the point of inability to use.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
[In my opinion] the features allowed by the system are not designed for providers. [I think] the systems are inefficient, and new features tend to be "bolt on" features either as products purchased and added from other providers or simply a module created and strapped onto the software. There doesn't seem to be much idea around making things easier for the provider, though they like to state that provider burnout is something they are working on.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
I often cannot assign a proper diagnosis under the assessment section; and as mentioned, sometimes (about once a month) the dictation just freezes because "the request has timed out" (even restarting the iPhone/ laptop does not help).
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
You put in support cases through a support portal. [I believe] for no apparent reason, the company decided that their support cannot have access to actual patient records and as a result, it's required that they have to connect remotely to a computer system in our network, and log in as one of our users to do anything. This also entails that they are completely incapable of diagnosing problems and require significant amounts of user input and time to try and begin any sort of work on the problems. [In my opinion] this takes away from patient care and other concerns. Also, while you can put in as detailed a ticket as you want, when you are called, you have to go over the ticket again, as they don't seem to read or care what you put in, as it's more important to them to go over everything in painful detail. Often times you must explain to the tech how the process works. In the past month, we were upgraded overnight with zero warning, which caused issues the following day as we had to update every single computer in our network (over 300) and it requires administrative privileges so couldn't be done by a user. This also doesn't update any information in the programs list, so there's no way to tell whether the update happened or not.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
Paid for training, did not help. They trained prior to go-live, but it was so long ahead that users weren't able to function well when it actually happened, they seemed unable to provide adequate support. [In my experience] further support is typically very boilerplate, and is thus not useful, and has additional cost.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
It's very important to limit your schedule during the weeks after go live but it is equally important to have a resource that is the lead at the practice that ensures that milestones are met leading up to the go-live date. Someone must be the point person at the practice otherwise milestones will be missed and the implementation will run into problems.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
There are a lot of software programs out there that do the same or similar things, but we chose Smartcare Software because it was good value for money. All the functionality it offers address the elements of our business that allow us to be more efficient. It is user friendly and the support is prompt and knowledgeable
Read full review
eClinicalWorks is above average for primary care outpatient services. It is not my favorite but it is not the worst either. ECW was selected by the group prior to my arrival so I cannot speak to why it was selected. I had an easy time adopting it but I have an extensive history of working with EMRs as a CMIO. As a company, they are constantly work to improve their product
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Time saved with pre-packaged reports
  • Real-time alerts/notifications that allow us to be proactive and not reactive
  • HR functions increase productivity and efficiency
Read full review
  • I will just share one area that our organization saw the ROI in a very short time period. That is the elimination of a dictation service for most of our specialty group doctors when we introducec Dragon Medical. This functionality brought a tangible benefit and a significant ROI in a short time period.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Aaniie Care Screenshots

Screenshot of access to case details on a mobile device with real-time access to schedules, care plans, route details, time tracking, and documentation.Screenshot of Aaniie's drag-and-drop scheduling, with color-coding and icon indicators that help identify shift issues all while real-time alerting on late and missed shifts.Screenshot of the software' advanced analytics & KPIs that reveal agency’s performance and visualizes trends, with customizable KPI dashboards.Screenshot of Caregiver Rewards, an embedded caregiver engagement system. It leverages gamification principles to make the job fun, to improve caregiver retention rates. Caregivers can use their points to redeem rewards, such as days off or gift cards.