A10 Thunder Convergent Firewall (CFW) vs. Cisco ASA 5500-X with FirePOWER Services

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
A10 Thunder Convergent Firewall (CFW)
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
A10 Networks offers A10 Thunder CFW (for Convergent Firewall), a combined firewall and secure web gateway. For mobile operators, the consolidation of multiple security features ensures protection against 4G/LTE threats as well as emerging 5G security threats. For data centers, Thunder CFW consolidates data center firewall, IPsec VPN, load balancer and secure web gateway solutions for enterprise deployments.N/A
Cisco ASA 5500-X with FirePOWER Services
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Cisco offers a threat-focused next-generation firewall (NGFW), the ASA 5500-X Series. The ASA 5500 Series platforms can run either the Cisco ASA Firewall or Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD). The series features appliances in a variety of form factors, including standalone options for small and midsize businesses, ruggedized appliances for extreme environments, midsize appliances for security at the Internet edge, and high-performance appliances for enterprise data centers.N/A
Pricing
A10 Thunder Convergent Firewall (CFW)Cisco ASA 5500-X with FirePOWER Services
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
A10 Thunder Convergent Firewall (CFW)Cisco ASA 5500-X with FirePOWER Services
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsCisco ASA 5500-X pricing starts at ~$400 and scales up to $20,000 for higher capacity appliances.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
A10 Thunder Convergent Firewall (CFW)Cisco ASA 5500-X with FirePOWER Services
Features
A10 Thunder Convergent Firewall (CFW)Cisco ASA 5500-X with FirePOWER Services
Firewall
Comparison of Firewall features of Product A and Product B
A10 Thunder Convergent Firewall (CFW)
-
Ratings
Cisco ASA 5500-X with FirePOWER Services
9.0
Ratings
4% above category average
Identification Technologies00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Visualization Tools00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Content Inspection00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Policy-based Controls00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Active Directory and LDAP00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Firewall Management Console00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Reporting and Logging00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
VPN00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
High Availability00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Stateful Inspection00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Proxy Server00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
A10 Thunder Convergent Firewall (CFW)Cisco ASA 5500-X with FirePOWER Services
Small Businesses
pfSense
pfSense
Score 9.9 out of 10
pfSense
pfSense
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.6 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Score 10.0 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
A10 Thunder Convergent Firewall (CFW)Cisco ASA 5500-X with FirePOWER Services
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
A10 Thunder Convergent Firewall (CFW)Cisco ASA 5500-X with FirePOWER Services
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
The scenario implemented by our teams was for edge protection. We also created a DMZ network for access to some servers and services. Our firewall has a remote SSL VPN license that allows remote access for several employees working from home or traveling on business. We created web access networks with content filtering, specific application protection with AVC, IPS, and protection against malware and external intruders. Cisco ASA with FirePOWER Services is one of the best solutions in the market that we researched for a long time to protect our data and access from intruders.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Cisco ASA 5500-X with FirePOWER Services are very well suited for most environments.
  • Cisco ASA 5500-X with FirePOWER Services have a variety of networking features including NextGen, web content filtering, data analysis, high availability failover, packet inspection, context-based ACL, and other features to protect your networks.
  • It's easy to deploy and manage.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • URL Filtering feature could be easier to utilize for beginners
  • I'd like to see a visual of VPN networks setup and show the functioning or malfunctioning status to assist in making troubleshooting easier
  • Recommendations on ACLs for beginners based on their account creation date
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Ever since we installed Cisco ASA 5500-X with FirePOWER Services we have never had to deal with an attack. We can see in the logs almost every day hackers attempting to break into our networks and failing. We also have the ability to blacklist every IP address that attempts to break into our firewalls
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Cisco firepower provides automatation for an organisations security operations to detect and stop the most advanced threats fast. It also assists in preventing attacks in using intelligence and innovative solutions.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
We have never had an outage caused by firewall failure. We have had a few outages caused by the internet failing or cloud applications going offline but never a firewall breaking down. When making changes we have a very strong change control, major software updates are always carried out out of working hours. At places where we have two firewalls in HA, we are able to do upgrades in working ours and the users will never know that an upgrade is taking place, that how great these firewalls are
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
The Cisco ASA 5500X with Firepower performance needs consideration before deploying. Although the solution is Pay as you grow, adding additional features to the system has a negative impact on overall throughput. I would more like now only to deploy the Cisco FPR units as they have better performance and will last the test of time.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I would recommend the purchase of the Smartnet 24x7 service in the case of a unit and the Smartnet 8x5NBD in the case of only one appliance installed on site. This service is important to always have the latest firmware updates, corrective updates and especially the hardware warranty and maintenance service in case of problems. The service is done by phone or on the official Cisco website and I can say that it is very good and efficient.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
We implemented a centralized management of all our Cisco ASA 5500-x with FirePOWER Services so that we can have a holistic view of all our sites in London and other European countries. This also helps when making changes, instead of login on to each firewall we can use Firepower Management Center (FMC) to central deploy changes across all devices
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
The network is homogenous to Cisco and the integration with Cisco products is very easy (e.g. Identity Services Engine). As I am a certified engineer in Cisco Security, it feels very easy to handle Cisco products especially as more and more support docs are available across the internet and Cisco portal. The support from Cisco is also on the very next level. Even the community support for issues on the Cisco community is better than the support provided by the different vendor firewalls.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • As an integrated appliance, we saved costs on getting other security technologies.
  • It provided secure access to our remote users, saving costs and time as our users could get access to the network anywhere and anytime.
  • Since we have other Cisco devices, integration was seamless.
  • Integration with Active Directory meant we did not need to create addition user accounts.
Read full review
ScreenShots