3SL Cradle vs. OpenText ALM/Quality Center
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
3SL Cradle | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Cradle from UK company 3SL is an application requirements management platform. | $449 |
OpenText ALM/Quality Center | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | OpenText™ ALM/Quality Center, formerly from Micro Focus, serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps users to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes. | N/A |
| 3SL Cradle | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Please note that Cradle is licenced by fully floating concurrent module licences. So pricing will depend on your usage pattern. For example licencing for 10 engineers may require 7 REQ (Requirements Management) , only 2 SYS (Systems Engineering Modelling) and say 1 DASH (Dashboard analytics). Licences are only locked when that function is accessed, which means a large user base can have access to all functionality at a much low cost than usual pricing. That's why it's good to call. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| 3SL Cradle | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 83% Would buy again 5 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 80% Delivers good value for the price 4 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 83% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| 3SL Cradle | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Polarion ALM Score9.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Jama Connect Score9.4 out of 10 | PTC Windchill RV&S Score7.7 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ![]() IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management Score7 out of 10 | Polarion ALM Score9.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| 3SL Cradle | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 7.1 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 3.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 7.4 |
| Ease of integration | - | 1.0 |
| 3SL Cradle | OpenText ALM/Quality Center | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | 3SL Cradle Screenshots |








