TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

3SL Cradle vs. IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    3SL Cradle

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ACradle from UK company 3SL is an application requirements management platform.

    $449

    IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AIBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) is an end-to-end engineering solution used to manage system requirements to design, workflow, and test management, extending the functionality of ALM tools for better complex-systems development.N/A
    Pricing
    3SL CradleIBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Editions & Modules
    Cradle‐RM Desktop
    $449
    Cradle‐RM Pro
    $529
    Cradle‐SE Desktop
    $599
    Cradle‐SE Pro
    $679
    Enterprise
    call
    Floating licences per module
    Enterprise - various deployments available
    call
    Platform and floating licences
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    3SL CradleIBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsPlease note that Cradle is licenced by fully floating concurrent module licences. So pricing will depend on your usage pattern. For example licencing for 10 engineers may require 7 REQ (Requirements Management) , only 2 SYS (Systems Engineering Modelling) and say 1 DASH (Dashboard analytics). Licences are only locked when that function is accessed, which means a large user base can have access to all functionality at a much low cost than usual pricing. That's why it's good to call.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    3SL CradleIBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Considered Both Products
    3SL
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    7 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    3SL CradleIBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Jama Connect
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Jama Connect
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Score7 out of 10
    Jama Connect
    Score9.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    3SL CradleIBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.8
    (22 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (6 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    2.1
    (4 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    3SL CradleIBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    3SL
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS former IBM Rational DOORS profits very much from the mighty market position it had till today. It had been the most favored requirement engineering tools suite with the highest investments in the infrastructure concerning hardware, software, and knowledge sources. It was embedded in knowledge sources of test stands, hardware labs, and knowledge database servers. It allowed for some of the highest profit changes and made the fame with it. But the paradigms of requirements engineering change. If not were superseded by completely different approaches for the target solution worlds. The foremost position in the selling tables is unstable if changes are not solved or coped with by the strategist at IBM and their customers. Since the highly successful alternative suits are already at the market, and some are from IBM already the lifecycle for IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS is at the later highs. But the suite is still at the very top and very popular. There are still many problems unsolved and many wishes at the customers to make the use more comfortable and efficient at the overall level. If the time of setting up the software package is passed the adoption get more extended and complicated. There is a lot of work at the stage around and the expertise will be required for a long time from now.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    3SL
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    • Easy to use with well defined template and user defined fields. New team can setup a project area easily by copying an existing template and adding customized fields for their special needs.
    • It can be used during almost the whole project cycle and give us a better view and control on the projects.
    • Lots of built-in report functions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    3SL
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    • Wireframes are quite basic. If you need intuitive and interactive wireframes to elaborate the requirements. you probably need to define outside the tool and then upload as image.
    • ER (define data dictionaries) modeling is not there.
    • Use case modeling is quite basic. You can visualize the use case and actors relation but the tool does not enforce the rules.
    • Does not support offline work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    3SL
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    At the moment we are required by contract to continue to use the IBM DOORS software for our current client. Given that it can be expensive, if we were to use it after our current client's needs were met, we would have to secure other projects in order to justify the continued use of the software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    3SL
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    The UI is terrible and not intuitive. Users need training in order to complete tasks. Much like SAP, it's not the clearest tool. The tracing feature is especially complicated because you must write the scripts yourself. There is a learning curve. Also, even the setup, installation, and logging in each time takes a considerable amount of time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    3SL
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    It does a basic job and has the potential to complete some robust reporting tasks, however, it really is a clunky piece of software with a terrible user interface that makes using it routinely quite unpleasant. Many of our legacy and maintenance projects still use DOORS but our department and company use many alternatives and are looking for better tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    3SL
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    No problems
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    3SL
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    It was easier to do all the change management-related activities, even configurations were handled very effectively. New process definitions and initiatives made it easier for better project deliverables. Effective resource allocations and better reporting and defect management. The overall cost of the tool is great too and well within budget.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    3SL
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    • If you can setup DOORS to your project, you will experience lower costs.
    • Also, less rework in the project, which means lower times to achieve your milestones.
    • Finally, the cost of setting up a related project is considerably lower, and the estimates obtained in the process are much more precise.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    3SL Cradle Screenshots

    Screenshot of An automatically generated hierarchy diagram, showing the interlinks, in this case between requirements, specifications and regulationsScreenshot of Systems Engineering modelling showing a Data Flow Diagram with main system connecting to external environmentScreenshot of Part of the SysML example project shipped to "get you going"Screenshot of Example of the TEST Module showing Test Execution