TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

3M M*Modal Fluency vs. Amberscript

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    3M M*Modal Fluency

    N/AN/AM*Modal, a 3M company, offers the Fluency suite of speech-to-text applications designed to support the medical profession, radiologists and doctors, for note taking, entry of data into integratable EHR applications, and related functions.N/A

    Amberscript

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AAmberscript, headquartered in Amsterdam, helps users transform audio and video to text and subtitles through the use of its AI-driven on-demand software service.

    $10

    Prepaid: 1 hour of audio or video uploaded

    Pricing
    3M M*Modal FluencyAmberscript
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Pre-Paid
    $10
    per hour of audio or video uploaded
    Subscription
    $25
    per month
    Manual transcription
    from $1.40
    per minute
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    3M M*Modal FluencyAmberscript
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Discount available for annual subscription.
    More Pricing Information
    User Ratings
    3M M*Modal FluencyAmberscript
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    3M M*Modal FluencyAmberscript
    Likelihood to Recommend
    3M
    No answers on this topic
    Amberscript
    Amberscript is great for transcribing individual audio (or video) files that reside on your computer. The ability to view and edit the text of the text file (to correct or remove data that you don't want to be shared) before the output is a great option. I feel it may be limited in the ability to transcribe live audio records such as phone calls or meetings, where we would find it very useful to have immediate access to a transcript (for coaching or sharing purposes). I feel the needs are more designed as a solution for pre-existing audio/video files versus working in real-time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    3M
    No answers on this topic
    Amberscript
    • Automated Speech to text transcribing
    • Video and Audio file to text data file conversion
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    3M
    No answers on this topic
    Amberscript
    • There does not appear to be a way to transcribe live audio (such as a live meeting or live phone call)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    3M
    No answers on this topic
    Amberscript
    I feel that Amazon Transcribe was much more feature-rich, allowing for a much more real-time solution, whereas Amberscript is great for transcribing existing call recordings (or video files) to a rich text file. Amazon Transcribe will do both, while Amberscript only does the latter. For our business, this was a significant feature loss for Amberscript.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    3M
    No answers on this topic
    Amberscript
    • Having an automated speech-to-text conversion allows us to reduce human hours, which would normally take notes or have to review long audio files.
    • Being able to transcribe multiple call recordings into a searchable text format allows for coaching of issues in a much more efficient format than an audio recording.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots