TrustRadius

1upHealth vs. Amazon API Gateway

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
1upHealth
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
As a specialist of FHIR® interoperability, 1upHealth focuses on bridging the gap between patient centered data and provider needs, thus creating a platform for patients to aggregate and share medical data from external health systems and wearable devices with providers, to enable improved healthcare outcomes and lower costs. 1upHealth provides data interoperability between healthcare systems, boasting a low cost at fractions of a cent per API call, utilizing the latest FHIR® standards,…N/A
Amazon API Gateway
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
AWS offers the Amazon API Gateway supports the creation and publication of an API for web applications, as well as its monitoring and maintenance. The Amazon API Gateway is able to support thousands of API calls concurrently and provides traffic management, as well as monitoring and access control.
$0.90
Per Million
Pricing
1upHealthAmazon API Gateway
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Past 300 Million
$0.90
Per Million
First 300 Million
$1.00
Per Million
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
1upHealthAmazon API Gateway
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
1upHealthAmazon API Gateway
Features
1upHealthAmazon API Gateway
API Management
Comparison of API Management features of Product A and Product B
1upHealth
-
Ratings
Amazon API Gateway
7.7
Ratings
7% below category average
API access control00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Rate limits and usage policies00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
API usage data00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
API user onboarding00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
API versioning00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Usage billing and payments00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
API monitoring and logging00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Best Alternatives
1upHealthAmazon API Gateway
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
1upHealthAmazon API Gateway
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
1upHealthAmazon API Gateway
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
API GW is great for giving access to asynchronous operations that are fast and don't need to be online all the time. Lambda functions are the classic example. In the past, an operation that is called on via an HTTP endpoint would be implemented using a server-based solution. With high availability in place that would include a server or two and a load balancer. Over time this setup can be costly, especially if the service is not used at full capacity; cycles are wasted when the servers are sitting there waiting to respond. If the operation can be distilled down to a function, an API GW + Lambda solution could be put in place that performs the operation as needed only when requested. Comparing the low price point for API GW requests and Lambda CPU+Memory, the savings can be night and day over the server-based implementation.
Michael Jenkins | TrustRadius Reviewer
Michael Jenkins
Senior Systems Reliability Engineer
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • API Gateway integrates well with AWS Lambda. This allows us to build a web server in the language and framework of our choice, deploy it as a Lambda function, and expose it through API Gateway.
  • API Gateway manages API keys. Building rate limiting and request quota features are not trivial (or interesting).
  • API Gateway's pricing can be very attractive for services that are accessed infrequently.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • I think there should be another way of enabling CORS. It basically creates OPTIONS for every endpoint, which makes your API Gateway look complicated.
  • The integration timeout limit is 30 seconds, which limits you into that time.
  • API Gateway UI should be improved and should work correctly when more than two people are adding/editing endpoints.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
We always had a great experience with the AWS support team. They were always on time and very dependable. It was a good partnership while we worked to resolve our issues.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Pricing is better at Amazon API gateway. Amazon API gateway is more user-friendly than SAP HANA Cloud. But SAP HANA Cloud supports more programming languages. The centralized management and monitoring system of Amazon API Gateway is more user-friendly. The User-Interface of Amazon API gateway is also better. Overall we can conclude that Amazon API Gateway provides a better work experience than SAP HANA.
Amritansu Sahoo | TrustRadius Reviewer
Amritansu Sahoo
Co-Founder
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Positive, which accelerated business deliveries in months
  • Negative, but in our positive case, if you are going to change the solution in the future, you need to adjust several things for the new solution.
  • Positive, users celebrated with ease of use (lower learning curve, lower cost).
  • Positive - Pay according to usage
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots